[rascalcode]

Hi - I am Ron, and my interest is writing alternate encryption methods.  I thought this might be a good place to get come comments on my methodology - sort of a peer review.

I think DES and AES are unintuitive and just messy and my attempt is to use simple procedures that can be combined to produce Cryptographically Secure (CS) encryption procedures.

I have written a subroutine library that I think is very powerful and can allow almost anyone to write their own powerful encryption code.  I am not asking for a critique of the code, but an analysis of the ideas.  I subset I can write unbreakable code (55,000 bit encryption) with keys each as long as 4,000 UTF-8 bytes (keyboard of text file content was the idea.)

Is this the right place?  Here is a teaser...

http://rascalcode.home.bresnan.net/case.html

Ron.

[johncrackernet]

Good man...nice article

[rascalcode]

Thanks...   Here is the 2nd teaser (with links to the main body of the argument in the tutor file.)

http://rascalcode.home.bresnan.net/basics.html

And here is a sample encryption/decryption using the ideas  in JavaScript so you can see how it works.

http://rascalcode.home.bresnan.net/rascal.html

I appreciate your reply...

Ron...

[Ðimi]

"The actual depth of encryption is directly related to the length of the key you use"

On that note, how are you controlling the length of the hash then? For example SHA-256 produces a 256-bit hashed string.

Nice page, btw